In the post-COVID era, there seems to be
an increased promotion of self-care amidst
the staffing challenges of “doing more with
less.” This is true for not only frontline clinical
staff, but also for all members of the care team,
including ethicists.
Mercy’s Ethics Council of eleven people,
scattered throughout the ministry, consists
primarily of Directors of Ethics throughout
the system in all the major markets, but also
includes the Executive Director of Ethics at the
ministry office and a couple mission leaders
who have backgrounds in ethics. They convene
weekly to discuss and collaborate on various
needs throughout the ministry. In the years
2022 and 2023, the group was composed of
a nice mix of veteran ethicists and those who
had been in the role 2 years or less. However,
due to the nature of those regular meetings,
there was not ample opportunity for the newer
ethicists to glean wisdom from the more senior
members of the group. At that time, it also
became apparent that the group needed space
for respite from the pressures that come from
the nature of their work.
Setting the Table
The Mercy Ethics Council was inspired by the
work of Steven Squires and Andrea Thornton
in their article, “Jacks and Jills of All Trades,
Experts of Some: Process Skills Training for
Ethics Programs” (HCEUSA, Fall 2022).1
In
discussing the article, the group felt that it
would be to beneficial to grow in some of the
skills discussed by Squires and Thornton. Of particular interest to the group was the idea
of verbatims—a tool used to train chaplains
in Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE).2
Squires
and Thornton describe the verbatim and its
usefulness for ethicists:
A verbatim includes a transcript of a
consult (from memory) with notes on
context, nonverbal communication, the
consultant’s mood, the consultant’s read on
the interlocutor(s)’ mood(s), and interpersonal
dynamics. The verbatim allows for reflection
on one’s own performance, including the
micro-politics and emotional factors that
influence analysis and communication. These
reflections are not simply private writing
experiences; they are presented before a group
of peers for discussion and evaluation. They
invite others to broaden the consultant’s self-awareness, bringing attention to habits or styles
of communication that may not serve the goals
of the consultation. Implementing the verbatim
in the training of ethics consultants will address
the gaps in process learning that the profession
currently experiences to improve ethics quality.3
Mercy’s Ethics Council members were
interested in the prospect of developing these
process skills and learning from the wisdom of
the group through the sharing and discussing
of cases using verbatims. Initially, the group
agreed to do this at a meeting that would
be separate from the weekly Ethics Council
meetings. This time together was dubbed
Ethics Tea Time as a nod to Mercy’s tradition
surrounding the “comfortable cup of tea” that
Catherine McAuley encouraged the sisters to share together upon her passing.4
Something’s Brewing…
Having gone through a unit of CPE myself, I
felt comfortable leading the charge. I created
a template to be used (included below) that
was based off the verbatim template that was
supplied for me when I did my unit of CPE. I
also set up a rotating schedule of who would be
tasked to ‘present.’
The following is the initial Mercy Ethics
Council Verbatim template:
ETHICS COUNCIL VERBATIM TEMPLATE
Instructions: The purpose of these verbatims is
manifold. The hope is that the writer would get
out of the verbatims whatever it is that they felt
they needed. This format is merely a suggested
format based off a CPE template. As the writer of
the verbatim, please include whatever details you
feel are necessary in order that you and the group
may get the most out of our time together (this,
of course, may vary from following the template
exactly to a product that’s more of a stream of
consciousness with thoughts and questions at the
end).
Ethicist's Name: | | Date Written: |
Patient's Initials: | Age: | Gender: |
Ethnicity: | Faith Tradition: | Patient's Location: |
Family Present: | Patient's Vocation: | |
Admission Date: | Date of Visit: | Length of Visit: |
Current Medical Problem: | | Prognosis: |
Reason for Visit: | Referred? Yes / No | Who Referred? |
- Summary of the case:
- Description of Patient as a Person: what
does the patient’s (and/or family/care
team member’s) appearance, gender, race,
diagnosis, language, etc. tell you about him
or her? Track your reactions to any of the
above here.
- Verbatim Dialogue (if you feel inclined to
recount, verbatim, part of the consult, you
may do so here)5
Dialogue goes here | Ethicist's thoughts on this side |
Patient said... | |
Ethicist said... | |
Care team member said... (etc.) |
- Competence: Reflect on the ethics
“interventions” (logic-related or as a
facilitator) you used. How were they guided
by your interior process? What pastoral
skills did you use? Mention specific areas
of challenge by letter and number (like C2,
etc.) if you chose to include a verbatim.
- What are some things you want to get out
of the group discussion of this verbatim
(e.g., help with skills, answering specific
questions, feedback, group case discussion,
rapport building with the ethics group)?
- Answer this question: “What do I want to
learn from this verbatim?” Please do not
ask the group to tell you what you did
well or did poorly. Explore those here for
discussion with the group.
ADJUSTING THE RECIPE... ADDING MILK &
SUGAR
Fairly quickly, there was a need to change.
The verbatim became just another thing to
do for our busy ethicists. There was near-unanimous agreement that the time it would
take to engage in a verbatim with the accuracy
and intention that the exercise intends, and
that the group wanted to give, would not be
possible. The move was then made away from
assigned, formatted verbatims to maintaining a
regular time for general case discussion that was
optional to attend. At times when no one had a
case to present, the time together was oriented
towards fellowship and enjoying the company
of peers. Currently, Ethics Tea Time has a spot
on everyone’s calendar every week. On even
weeks, it is held in the morning, and occurs in
the afternoon on odd weeks. Both instances of
Tea Time take place on different days of the
week to maximize the possibility that one might
work with people’s schedules.
FINDING THAT COMFORTABLE CUP OF
TEA
The Mercy Ethics Council is still working to
find a version of Ethics Tea Time that suits the
needs of the group. Feedback about the time
together has been overwhelmingly positive as
it has been an opportunity for many to enjoy
fellowship with those who can intimately
relate to the challenges and opportunities
that come with the role. One of the main
opportunities moving forward for Teat Time
is to find the balance between the original
intention of growing in those process skills
that are critical to the role and not making the
event an onerous one, all the while creating an
opportunity for fellowship. The future goal for
Ethics Tea Time is that it can continue to adapt
to suit the group’s changing needs and fill the
Mercy ethicists’ cups.
ADDISON S. TENORIO, PHD(C)
Executive Director of Mission
Mercy Hospital Ardmore
Ardmore, Oklahoma
ENDNOTES
- Jacks and Jills of All Trades, Experts of Some: Process
Skills Training for Ethics Programs (chausa.org)
- Ibid., pg. 15.
- Ibid.
- For more on the tradition surrounding the “comfortable
cup of tea”: The Power of Tea - Sisters of Mercy.
- Of note, this chart is small simply to demonstrate the
format. A verbatim is typically the recounting of a whole
or part of a conversation. Therefore, it has many back-and-forth interactions (often, between multiple people).