BY: SUZY FARREN
Ms. Farren is manager, corporate communications, SSM Health Care, St. Louis.
Women Religious Have Long Provided Care for America's Poor, Outcast, and
Disenfranchised
I credit the vision of a nurse with the fact that SSM Health Care,
St. Louis, recently became the first health care organization to win the Malcolm
Baldrige National Quality Award. Her clear and unwavering vision of how good
our organization could become, coupled with her enormous strength of will, mobilized
23,000 employees, 5,000 physicians, and 5,000 volunteers at more than a score
of facilities in four states. SSM Health Care's focus is its mission. "Through
our exceptional health care," its mission statement says, "we reveal the healing
presence of God." The culture of constant improvement that now characterizes
the system will continue long after the Baldrige Award ceremony has faded to
a distant memory.
Interestingly, the nurse who leads SSM Health Care is also a nun: Sr. Mary
Jean Ryan, a Franciscan Sister of Mary. Sr. Ryan is an extraordinary woman.
Like the nurse nuns who built Catholic health care in this nation, she can be
demanding. But like those pioneer healers, she has the courage to stand up for
what she believes and the inner strength to persevere in the face of seemingly
insurmountable obstacles.
It's good for those of us who work in Catholic health care to remember that
that history is not a thing wholly of the past. People continue to make history
every day, and it is essential for us to recognize events that are historical.
It's good for us, too, to recognize that figures whom we now regard as historic
were, in their own times, seen as countercultural. In fact, they were simply
doing what they felt called to do.
Sister nurses distinguished themselves in history by caring not only for the
public in general but also by caring—joyfully—for people shunned by society:
people who had no money, were poor in spirit, were diseased, disfigured, disabled,
alone, aged, or downtrodden. Catholic sisters who provided nursing care viewed
health care as an expression of God's love for all people. If they could not
save lives, they could at least try to save souls.
Emily Friedman, the noted health care author and lecturer, points out that
the sister nurses made no distinction between what was clinical and what was
social. Writes Friedman: "They provided nursing care, to be sure, but they read
to the illiterate while they were dying, sang to those who were lonely while
they bandaged their wounds, and taught children their letters while they cleansed
sores caused by Hansen's disease. They understood the concept of social medicine,
of population-based health care, of healthy communities, long before these ideas
became commonplace."1
Charity for All
One of the first women religious to articulate a Catholic approach to nursing
care was Mother Mary Xavier Clark, a Daughter of Charity of St. Vincent dePaul,
who wrote "Instructions for the Care of the Sick" around 1841. "Our charity
must be extended to all," Mother Clark wrote.2 That simple message
speaks eloquently to the ministry of healing. Mother Clark called for the fair
and equitable distribution of medicine and food to all patients, explaining
that, "a patient should be able to say, when a Sister leaves his bedside, 'That
Sister is more like an angel than a human being. The very sight of her makes
me think of God and love him.'"3
In the mid-1800s, Sr. Mathilde Coskery, also a Daughter of Charity, wrote
the first comprehensive document on nursing, which she called Advices on
Care of the Sick. In addition to a wealth of practical recommendations,
the document offered this advice about alcoholics: "For God's sake do not laugh
at them or suffer others to treat them with contempt, though this should be
the hundredth time he has been brought to your care."4
It was the Daughters of Charity who trained Florence Nightingale at the Institute
of St. Vincent de Paul in Alexandria, Egypt. Nightingale was impressed with
the sisters' organization, training, and discipline. She wrote: "What training
is there compared with that of a Catholic nun? Those ladies who are not Sisters
have not the chastened temper, the Christian grace, the accomplished loveliness
and energy of the regular nun. I have seen something of different kinds of nuns
and am no longer young, and do not speak from enthusiasm but from experience."5
In 1854 Nightingale took 18 nuns, some Catholic, some Anglican, to Russia with
her to serve as nurses in the Crimean War.
The Civil War
The same discipline that so impressed Florence Nightingale helped women religious
adapt to the demanding lives they would lead as nurses in our Civil War. "The
Sisters brought to their aid in caring for the sick and wounded soldiers the
experience, training and discipline of the religious bodies with which they
were identified," notes one writer.6 "Self-denial was a feature of their daily
life, and the fact that they had taken vows of poverty, chastity and obedience
peculiarly fitted them for a duty that demanded personal sacrifices almost every
hour of the day and night."
Through the long, bloody war, 617 sisters from 12 congregations served as
nurses on the battlefields, in military hospitals, on transport ships, in prisons,
and on the first naval hospitals. Mother Augusta Anderson, a Sister of the Holy
Cross from Notre Dame, IN, described the horrific scenes the sisters witnessed:
"Many wounded men whose limbs had been amputated were there with little or no
care. We pinned up our habits, got brooms and buckets of water, and washed the
blood-stained walls. We were not prepared as nurses, but our hearts made our
hands willing, and with God's help, we did much toward alleviating the suffering."7
In military hospitals, the sisters willingly gave their beds to wounded soldiers
and slept on the floor. They did not differentiate between Union and Confederate,
Caucasian and African-American, or Catholic and non-Catholic soldiers. Anti-Catholic
sentiment had been significant in the United States before the war, but the
sisters' service during it did much to improve the image of Catholics.
Abraham Lincoln wrote of the sisters' wartime service: "Of all the forms of
charity and benevolence seen in the crowded wards of the hospitals, those of
some Catholic sisters were among the most efficient. . . . More lovely than
anything I had ever seen in art, so long devoted to illustrations of love, mercy,
and charity, are the pictures that remain of these modest sisters going on their
errands of mercy among the suffering and the dying."8
Personal Sacrifice
In peacetime as well as during war, the sisters sought to meet the needs of
their communities, sometimes at great personal sacrifice.
An event in the early history of Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh illustrates
this sacrifice. In January 1848, the Sisters of Mercy admitted a sick boatman
to their hospital. When they realized he had typhus, the sisters, most of whom
were Irish immigrants, thought of the deadly epidemics they had witnessed in
Ireland. Despite their fear, they cared for the patient, and subsequently opened
a special ward to care for 18 additional typhus victims who arrived at the hospital.
The sisters nursed these patients night and day, exhausting themselves. By the
time the epidemic ended less than a month later, all but four of the patients
had recovered. But the entire nursing staff—four Sisters of Mercy, all of them
under 30 years old—had died.9
Similarly, in 1878, when yellow fever broke out in Memphis and Canton, MS,
the St. Louis-based Franciscan Sisters of Mary (as they are now known) sent
a third of the congregation—13 sisters—to nurse the sick. Following the death
of five of the sisters, Sister Rose, aged 23, wrote this letter to Mother Odilia
Berger, the congregation's leader:
I am homesick, Reverend Mother, and every day I wish I could see you, even
if only for a moment; then everything would be alright. Since that is not
possible, I must be prepared to live my vocation as well as possible. The
yellow fever is really horrible and the other sisters are still quite weak
and can't be left alone. I feel so lonely during the days and nights, being
500 miles away from you and unable to listen to your words. It seems an eternity
to me and I hope that God will let me come home soon. . . . Only four nights
have I been able to take off my clothes when I went to bed, all the other
nights I was always caring for the sick. However, I am happy to be of service.10
Among many congregations that cared for the sick during the influenza epidemic
of 1918 was the Sisters of Mercy from Cincinnati. Sr. Raphael O'Conner and 15
other sisters traveled in mule carts through the hills of Kentucky to attend
to members of coal-mining families who had contracted influenza. Sr. O'Connor
died while nursing the sick, just days before her 58th birthday. An official
of the American Red Cross wrote to the congregation: "I am so distressed to
hear that one of your number paid the 'supreme sacrifice' after her heroic work
in helping others. She no less gave her life for her country than did our brave
boys; for this flu epidemic threatened our country most seriously, and nowhere
was the suffering more than in our mountain section. I know that you did everything
to save her, but that her life went as she wanted it to be in doing for others."11
Service to People in Need
Being of service was what mattered to Henriette DeLille, a light-skinned woman
of color, who, decades before the Civil War, responded to the needs of elderly
slaves who had been abandoned by their masters. Born in New Orleans in 1813,
DeLille could have declared herself white according to the law of the time,
but she refused to deny her heritage. But, as a woman of color, DeLille was
not permitted to join a white congregation. So, in 1842, she founded the Sisters
of the Holy Family, a religious community for women of color. The sisters' ministry
was to care for the elderly, particularly former slaves. To the elderly the
sisters opened their own quarters, in which they nursed them and provided a
home. Although DeLille died before Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation
in 1863, the institution she founded—Lafon Nursing Home—exists to this day in
a New Orleans suburb.12
Another historical figure who left a lasting legacy was Rose Hawthorne Lathrop,
the daughter of the great New England novelist Nathaniel Hawthorne. Her ministry,
in the late 1800s, was care for poor people with cancer, a disease then thought
to be contagious. Going from tenement to tenement in the poorest section of
New York City, Lathrop nursed the poor and the dying in their own homes. In
1899 she opened St. Rose's Free Home for Incurable Cancer, and in 1900 she founded
the congregation now known as the Hawthorne Dominican Sisters. She refused to
accept any form of payment for her services from patients and supported her
ministry through begging. To this day, the sisters operate St. Rose's Home in
New York City. And they still refuse to accept payment from patients for their
services.13
Many Americans have heard of Fr. Damien de Veuster and his work with the lepers
of Molokai, HI, but few know about Mother Marianne Cope, a Sister of St. Francis
of Syracuse, NY. In June 1883, Mother Cope received a letter from a bishop requesting
help with a ministry to lepers in Hawaii. More than 50 religious congregations
had turned down the bishop's appeal, but Mother Cope was intrigued by it. That
October, she and six other sisters left Syracuse, expecting to be gone for only
a few weeks. She never returned.
The sisters worked at the Branch Hospital in Kakaako, HI. Among their tasks
was dressing the lepers' sores. In her book Song of Pilgrimage and Exile,
Sr. Mary Laurence Hanley, OSF, describes the task: "Each sister-nurse learned
to wash away the scabs, the pus, the maggots, the rot from those fetid ulcers,
to cut away the dead putrescent flesh at the margins of the sores, to apply
soothing ointments to the raw wounds, and to bind them about with clean cloths."14
Mother Cope enforced strict hygiene among her sisters. She promised them that
no Franciscan Sister would ever contract leprosy. None ever has.
Until her death in 1918, Mother Cope cared for people with leprosy (now called
Hansen's disease). After Fr. Damien died of the disease in 1889, she took over
his Leper Settlement on Molokai. She transformed these group homes, once dens
where the reviled outcasts lived in squalor, into places where there was always
music and the patients were stylishly dressed. She grew plants, fruit, and vegetables,
and restored dignity to people who had lost all hope. To this day, her religious
community maintains a presence on Molokai.15
A similar commitment to lepers was made by the Daughters of Charity in Carville,
LA. In 1896 four sisters went to Carville to care for people with the disease.
Because the public so feared leprosy, the sisters could never, once they had
arrived at the Louisiana Leper Home (as it was then called), leave it to return
to the larger society. The Leper Home was a small community in the swamp, which
was itself rife with malaria and water moccasins. There the sisters provided
care for people who otherwise would have received none. The sisters' commitment
has spanned the centuries. Even after the federal government took over the home,
the Daughters of Charity maintained a presence there. And although the home
was closed to new patients in 1999 (because there is now a cure for Hansen's
disease), the Daughters have chosen to remain there with elderly residents who
intend to live there until they die.
Today talk of a possible smallpox epidemic provokes great fear in this country.
However, numerous congregations have in the past provided care to people with
smallpox. In the summer of 1868, for example, Mother Baptist Russell and Sr.
M. Frances Benson, both Sisters of Mercy, asked the municipal government of
San Francisco to allow them to take charge of the local "pesthouse" during a
smallpox epidemic. They explained their request in a letter:
It is one of the privileges of the Sisters of Mercy that we attend on our
fellow in whatever form of disease it is the Divine Will to afflict them.
Therefore, if the City Authorities are willing to accept our Services, two
of our Sisters will D.V. [Deo volente, or "God willing"] go to the
Pest house and take up residence until such time as the Almighty wills to
deliver the City from this terrible malady. . . . One room is all we require.
You know the accommodation of a Sister of Mercy is very simple.16
After she and her colleagues had begun their work, Sr. Benson wrote to the
sisters in Ireland about smallpox: "It is truly a horrible disease, so loathsome,
so disgusting, so pitiable. . . . Not one spot from the crown of the head to
the sole of the foot was sound, the eyes of the greater number closed and pus
running from them down the cheeks; their throats so sore that to take a drink
almost chokes them . . . and the mal-odour so terrible that they themselves
cry out: 'O Sister, I cannot stand the smell.'"17
At the time, a local newspaper pointed out that:
none of our religious denominations have, like the Catholic Church, . .
. any organization that could furnish help—competent, intelligent, kind female
nurses to enter the home of misery and take charge of its ministrations to
the crowd of suffering humanity it contains. Those devoted Sisters of Mercy
willingly presented themselves and entered on a mission of charity from which
all others shrink in dismay and affright. . . . Their fearless, self-sacrificing
love is an honor to their Church and to their Order.18
Mother Russell and Sr. Benson nursed in the pesthouse for nine months, until
the epidemic subsided. Their congregation was one of many that responded to
smallpox and other fiercely contagious diseases.
Responding to Need across the Country
As immigration to the United States increased in the 19th century, so did demand
for health care. Priests who had come from Europe to settle in U.S. communities
sent requests back to their native lands for nuns to open hospitals and nurse
the sick here. On their arrival, the sisters opened convents and established
health ministries, in whatever form the community needed. Once the congregation
was established, it would often send two or more sisters to other parts of the
country in response to calls from bishops or priests.
Despite their poverty, their lack of fluency in English, and the fact that
America in the 1800s was definitely a man's world, the sisters opened hospitals
all across the nation. Not only did they open these hospitals, they staffed
them as well, often working 14 or more hours a day, seven days a week. They
nursed patients, fed them, did the washing, cleaned the hospital, and grew vegetables
and raised animals to provide food and milk. The vast majority of these sister
nurses lived and died in obscurity, known only to their birth families, their
religious sisters, and their patients.
For much of their history as nurses, Catholic women religious worked without
the aid of antibiotics and modern technology, so their care was necessarily
largely custodial. They could, however, do everything possible to make their
patients comfortable and to show them compassion. And somehow, even before Joseph
Lister, the sisters seemed to understand the link between cleanliness and health.
Training Programs for the Laity
By 1872 there were about 75 Catholic hospitals in the United States. By 1910
the number had grown to 400. As the number of hospitals increased, the need
for formal training programs for nurses—including lay nurses—grew as well. The
Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis opened the first Catholic
nursing school in the United States at St. John's Hospital in Springfield, IL,
in 1886. Other congregations followed suit. In 1893, Cardinal James Gibbons
of Baltimore wrote of the training received by such students: "Under the guidance
of the sisters, from whom they learn the principles which underlie the intelligent
treatment of the afflicted, they become skillful in the hospital wards, and
acquire that gentleness and ease of manner, that devotion to duty so much appreciated
by the physician and patient."19
As the 20th century began, nursing care was changing from the custodial to
the scientific, and the need for formal education for nurses was increasing.
In addition, hospitals were increasing their bed capacity, prompting a need
for nurses, both sisters and lay. By 1915, some 30 congregations sponsored 220
Catholic nursing schools.20
Civil Rights
In 1933 the congregation known today as the Franciscan Sisters of Mary opened
the first Catholic hospital for African Americans in the United States: St.
Mary's Infirmary in St. Louis. The opening of this hospital served two purposes.
It both provided care for the sick and offered much-needed opportunities for
African-American physicians and nurses to practice their professions. That same
year, the sisters opened St. Mary's School of Nursing, the nation's first school
of nursing for African Americans. It offered a three-year nursing diploma program.
In 1951, Sr. Helen Clare Bauerback, a Sister of Saint Joseph of Wheeling and
the administrator of St. Francis Hospital in Wheeling, WV, took what was then
the bold step of hiring three African-American nurses. When 25 staff nurses
threatened to leave the institution unless the three were fired, Sr. Bauerback
remained firm. Twenty white nurses quit. To keep the hospital from closing,
the congregation airlifted Sisters of Saint Joseph from other West Virginia
hospitals. Some physicians left as well and the patient census declined, but
the hospital weathered the controversy. The strike lasted about three months.21
Care outside the Walls
As Catholic hospitals grew into complex health care organizations staffed largely
by the laity, some sister nurses saw the need to go outside the walls of the
institution to provide care to people with unmet needs.
Sr. Mary Stella Simpson, a nurse midwife, was one of them. In 1967, at the
request of the American Nurses Association, Sr. Simpson, a Daughter of Charity,
went to Mound Bayou, MS—an impoverished African-American town—to care for pregnant
women and to educate young mothers. She was appalled that these women often
had to choose between taking a sick child to the doctor, on one hand, and feeding
the family, on the other. Sr. Simpson wrote letters to her congregation in Evansville,
IN, describing her work.
On February 23, 1968, she wrote:
I went to visit an expectant mother today. . . . She is the mother of 12,
all at home. They live in three small rooms. . . . The house was cold. One
gas heater in the middle room made very little heat. I was cold as I talked
to the mother, and I had on boots and my all-weather coat with a heavy lining.
. . . The baby was whining, trying to cry. I picked her up, and it was like
holding a frozen fish. The poor little darling had on a dress—period. . .
. How can a country as rich as ours have so much poverty? I keep asking myself
that question day after day.22
Sr. Simpson did make a difference in Mound Bayou. When she went back
to visit at the age of 83 in 1994, she visited the women for whom she had provided
care nearly three decades earlier. On the walls of their modest houses were
photographs of their children and grandchildren, the vast majority of whom have
graduated from college.
The Lay Challenge
Certainly the declining number of women religious will forever change Catholic
health care. SSM Health Care's Sr. Ryan, is one of only a few sisters left who
head health systems today.
Friedman, discussing the declining number of sisters in health care, predicts
that the great challenge for the laity will not be competition with for-profit
hospitals or reproductive issues. "It is that there will be fewer sisters in
the future, and therefore that spirit—that crystal-pure charitable spirit, that
pride in eschewing material things, but, most important, that majestic insistence
on serving—must somehow be kept in other vessels, in other ways."23
The struggle is different than it was for the nineteenth-century sisters, but
the foes, Friedman writes, are the same: "pain, suffering, abandonment, greed,
heartlessness, and hatred."
Mother Clark set the standard for Catholic health care when she wrote in 1841,
"Our charity must be extended to all." Throughout our history as a nation, sister
nurses have taken special joy in caring for the poor, the disenfranchised, the
people shunned by society, even when doing so was seen by society as countercultural.
After all, Jesus, the healer, was countercultural.
As we move forward, Catholic health care must celebrate its historic figures,
and, at the same time, recognize the people today who are shaping the future,
for they will one day be seen as historic figures themselves.
NOTES
- Emily Friedman, "Fulfilling the Sisters' Promise," Health Progress,
January-February 1997, pp. 50-55.
- Mother Clark is quoted in Christopher J. Kauffman, Ministry & Meaning:
A Religious History of Catholic Health Care in the United States, Crossroad,
New York City, 1995, p. 37.
- Kauffman, p. 39.
- Suzy Farren, A Call to Care: The Women Who Built Catholic Healthcare
in America8 Catholic Health Association, St. Louis, 1996, p. 138.
- J. B. Darcy, "Florence
Nightingale and the Sisters of Mercy."
- George Barton, "A History of the Labors
of the Catholic Sisterhoods in the Civil War."
- Farren, p. 9.
- Farren, p. 15.
- Farren, p. 206.
- M. Agnita Claire Day, A Woman for All Times: Mother Mary Odilia,
Franciscan Sisters of Mary, St. Louis, 1980, p. 373.
- Farren, p. 111.
- Farren, p. 162.
- Farren, pp. 200-205.
- Mary Laurence Hanley and O. A. Bushnell, Song of Pilgrimage and Exile:
The Life and Spirit of Mother Marianne of Molokai, Franciscan Herald Press,
Chicago, 1981.
- Farren, pp. 97-103.
- Kauffman, p. 124. The bracketed phrase is Kauffman's.
- Kauffman.
- Kauffman, pp. 124-125.
- Kauffman, p. 161.
- Kauffman, p. 167.
- Farren, p. 37.
- Farren, p. 218.
- Friedman, pp. 54-55.